Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Discordance between the way select is called.

From: Patrice Drolet <pdrolet(at)infodata(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Discordance between the way select is called.
Date: 2005-05-01 20:21:46
Message-ID: 42753A5A.6030004@infodata.ca (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql
Hi,

I have a java app that uses hibernate to do queries.

One query on a 6.5 millions records takes about 15 seconds while the 
same one (take from the sql that shows in the consol - I configured 
hibernate to show_sql) takes about 50 ms when done with pgadmin3.

This is a simple select. Here is the log of pgsql:
 
<postgres%patient_record> LOG:  00000: statement: select notevalue0_.id 
as id, notevalue0_.value_note as value2_3_, notevalue0_.actif as 
actif3_, notevalue0_.id_note as id4_3_, notevalue0_.id_field_name as 
id5_3_ from note.note_value notevalue0_ where notevalue0_.id_note=$1 and 
notevalue0_.actif=1
<postgres%patient_record> LOCATION:  pg_parse_query, postgres.c:473
<postgres%patient_record> LOG:  00000: PLANNER STATISTICS
<postgres%patient_record> DETAIL:  ! system usage stats:
    !    0.001171 elapsed 0.000000 user 0.000000 system sec
    !    [0.050000 user 0.010000 sys total]
    !    0/0 [0/0] filesystem blocks in/out
    !    0/0 [0/0] page faults/reclaims, 0 [0] swaps
    !    0 [0] signals rcvd, 0/0 [8/84] messages rcvd/sent
    !    0/0 [7/0] voluntary/involuntary context switches
    ! buffer usage stats:
    !    Shared blocks:          2 read,          0 written, buffer hit 
rate = 95.74%
    !    Local  blocks:          0 read,          0 written, buffer hit 
rate = 0.00%
    !    Direct blocks:          0 read,          0 written
<postgres%patient_record> LOCATION:  ShowUsage, postgres.c:3341
<postgres%patient_record> LOG:  00000: EXECUTOR STATISTICS
<postgres%patient_record> DETAIL:  ! system usage stats:
    !    12.323373 elapsed 10.890000 user 1.140000 system sec
    !    [10.940000 user 1.150000 sys total]
    !    0/0 [0/0] filesystem blocks in/out
    !    0/0 [0/0] page faults/reclaims, 0 [0] swaps
    !    0 [0] signals rcvd, 0/0 [8/87] messages rcvd/sent
    !    0/0 [7/0] voluntary/involuntary context switches
    ! buffer usage stats:
    !    Shared blocks:      44305 read,          0 written, buffer hit 
rate = 0.00%
    !    Local  blocks:          0 read,          0 written, buffer hit 
rate = 0.00%
    !    Direct blocks:          0 read,          0 written

The $1 value is a simple integer and is a foreign key for another table. 
There were 4 rows only meeting this criteria. Can you explain to me the 
executor statistics? Why does it do 44305 read?

This query will be a stopper for us if not faster... :-(  Apart from 
this, we love postgres...

Thanks for any help.

Patrice Drolet
Logiciels INFO-DATA inc.

Responses

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-05-02 03:04:49
Subject: Re: pgtop, display PostgreSQL processes in `top' style
Previous:From: Dinesh PandeyDate: 2005-05-01 11:27:20
Subject: Re: How to connect ORACLE database from Postgres functionusing plpgsql/pltclu?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group