From: | "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ? |
Date: | 2005-04-30 23:19:20 |
Message-ID: | 42741278.2030502@phlo.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr wrote:
> wx2.5 is about to be removed from Debian official archive due
> to bugs. It will leave pgadmin3 package in a broken state and
> which would lead to a removal of it too. A transition is on
> the way, Ron explained to me that he would surely upload
> rapidly for wx2.6. I'd like to know if 1.2.0 would compile or
> not and/or if it would be hard to get it build on top of
> wx2.6 instead of 2.5...
> If not, what is the roadmap, if there is one, to a next stable
> release of pga3 based on top of wx2.6 ?
>
> All of these questions to help me to take the good decision
> concerning pgAdmin III in official Debian.
Hi
Couldn't you link pgadmin3 statically against wx2.5?
The current debian-packages work well (at least
for me), and who knows what bugs (be it pgadmin3-bugs
or wx-bugs) are revealed by switching wx versions...
greetings, Florian Pflug
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Raphaël Enrici | 2005-05-01 08:05:43 | Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ? |
Previous Message | blacknoz | 2005-04-30 21:01:30 | 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ? |