Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: maintenance_work_mem upper limit =1gb??

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Himanshu Baweja <himanshubaweja(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: maintenance_work_mem upper limit =1gb??
Date: 2005-05-26 19:03:13
Message-ID: 4272.1117134193@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
Himanshu Baweja <himanshubaweja(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> why has been maintenance_work_mem and work_mem been
> restricted to 1gb...

So as not to overflow on 32-bit machines.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: David ParkerDate: 2005-05-26 19:04:36
Subject: another failover testing question
Previous:From: David ParkerDate: 2005-05-26 18:56:38
Subject: Re: pg_listener records

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group