Re: Statement Timeout and Locking

From: Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>
To:
Cc: "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Statement Timeout and Locking
Date: 2005-04-28 17:35:34
Message-ID: 42711EE6.2020603@logix-tt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Hi, Tom,

Tom Lane schrieb:

> Anyway the short-term answer for Markus is "don't do it that way".
> We ought to think about making the backend's behavior more consistent,
> though.

I'll split the query into three. Having it in one query just was a
convenience here.

Thanks,
Markus

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Ristola 2005-04-28 17:44:37 Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2005-04-28 16:36:03 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vernon 2005-04-29 05:28:41 Is a way avoiding the driver crash with unicode data?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-04-28 15:59:41 Re: Statement Timeout and Locking