Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-04-28 05:48:42
Message-ID: 4270793A.5050302@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
> 
> Do companies want to write for Blue Hat PostgreSQL and Suza PostgreSQL
> because that might be what happens if we don't stay organized?  In fact,
> it might have be happening already.

Well that depends... If the companies are writing for Pervasive 
PostgreSQL I don't think they would have a problem with that ;).

And I do agree with you Bruce, it is happening already -- I don't think 
there is any question in that.


Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> 


-- 
Your PostgreSQL solutions provider, Command Prompt, Inc.
24x7 support - 1.800.492.2240, programming, and consulting
Home of PostgreSQL Replicator, plPHP, plPerlNG and pgPHPToolkit
http://www.commandprompt.com / http://www.postgresql.org

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-04-28 05:56:30
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Previous:From: Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SDDate: 2005-04-28 05:45:46
Subject: Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-04-28 05:56:30
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-04-28 05:30:30
Subject: Re: Increased company involvement

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group