Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, apoc9009(at)yahoo(dot)de,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
Date: 2005-04-28 01:43:09
Message-ID: 42703FAD.7040509@samurai.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> What's the point of keeping such backend development discussion separate 
> from the -hackers list?  It's always been a mistake in the past...

Yeah, it struck me as a bad idea as well.

-Neil

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-04-28 05:09:58
Subject: Increased company involvement
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-04-28 01:22:32
Subject: Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group