Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Final decision

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>,Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Joel Fradkin <jfradkin(at)wazagua(dot)com>,PostgreSQL Perform <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Final decision
Date: 2005-04-27 17:01:55
Message-ID: 426FC583.7050304@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
>>
>> It is? No-one told the developers...
> 
> 
> We have mentioned it on the list.
> 
> http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2002/07/16/drake.html

Ooops ;)

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-odbc/2005-03/msg00109.php

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake
Command Prompt, Inc.


-- 
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Greg StarkDate: 2005-04-27 17:16:48
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-04-27 16:46:02
Subject: Re: Final decision

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group