Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents
Date: 2005-04-22 04:21:09
Message-ID: 42687BB5.9070603@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> 
>>>I personally know the patent system is a mess, but it is not an
>>>overriding issue in my work with PostgreSQL.
>>
>>Your work with PostgreSQL (AFAIK) wouldn't run into the problem. People
>>like Berkus, myself, EnterpriseDB, Greenplumn, SRA (Yes I know they 
>>employ you), PgSQL, Inc., are who are going to run into the problem.
>>
>>All due respect but perhaps it is worth considering the issue as a total 
>>community versus just how it affects you.
> 
> 
> Yea, I have been at this for nine years because I look at all issues
> only from my perspective.  Do you honestly believe that?

Normally no, but your comment was :

but it is not an overriding issue in my work with PostgreSQL.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake




> 


In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2005-04-22 04:22:00
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-04-22 04:18:29
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2005-04-22 04:22:00
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-04-22 04:18:29
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group