When are index scans used over seq scans?

We have a table with 1M rows that contain sessions with a start and
finish timestamps. When joining this table with a 10k table with rounded
timestamps, explain shows me sequential scans are used, and the join
takes about 6 hours (2s per seq scan on session table * 10000):

Nested Loop (cost=252.80..233025873.16 rows=1035480320 width=97)
Join Filter: (("outer".starttime <= "inner".ts) AND ("outer".finishtime
>= "inner".ts))
-> Seq Scan on sessions us (cost=0.00..42548.36 rows=924536
width=105) -> Materialize (cost=252.80..353.60 rows=10080 width=8)
-> Seq Scan on duration du (cost=0.00..252.80 rows=10080 width=8)

However, during the initial loading of the data (we first load into text
tables, then convert to tables using timestamps etc, then run this
query) the same query took only 12 minutes. While debugging, I increased
cpu_tuple_cost to 0.1 (from 0.01). Now the explain shows an index scan,
and the run time comes down to 11 minutes:

Nested Loop (cost=0.00..667700310.42 rows=1035480320 width=97)
-> Seq Scan on sessions us (cost=0.00..125756.60 rows=924536 width=105)
-> Index Scan using ix_du_ts on duration du (cost=0.00..604.46
rows=1120 width=8)
Index Cond: (("outer".starttime <= du.ts) AND
("outer".finishtime >= du.ts))

I am glad that I found a way to force the use of the index, but still
can't explain why in the initial run the planner made the right choice,
but now I need to give it a hand. Could this have to do with the
statistics of the tables? I make very sure (during the initial load and
while testing) that I vacuum analyze all tables after I fill them.

I'm runing postgres 7.4.7.

Any help is appreciated.

--
Richard van den Berg, CISSP
-------------------------------------------
Trust Factory B.V. | www.dna-portal.net
Bazarstraat 44a | www.trust-factory.com
2518AK The Hague | Phone: +31 70 3620684
The Netherlands | Fax : +31 70 3603009
-------------------------------------------