Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgresql suitable replacement (Win 1GB / 100GB

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Sanjay Jain <sminni_news(at)minisoftindia(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql suitable replacement (Win 1GB / 100GB
Date: 2005-04-19 03:25:40
Message-ID: 42647A34.9020104@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
> Also forgot to ask earlier
> Will Postgres easily handle the 100GB+ database

I have a 10GB database on a 10M page views a month site, and it's fine 
(with some application level result set caching).

Chris

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2005-04-19 03:36:36
Subject: Re: Postgresql suitable replacement (Win 1GB / 100GB + dotnet + replication)
Previous:From: Sanjay JainDate: 2005-04-19 02:32:33
Subject: Re: Postgresql suitable replacement (Win 1GB / 100GB + dotnet + replication)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group