Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-04 21:32:48
Message-ID: 4251B280.6030600@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:

>On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 04:48:50PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
>  
>
>The problem is that even if you could build a Postgres support package
>for PHP without building the whole PHP (which you _can_ do AFAIK), it
>means that you need to make a second pass at the PHP source RPM, which
>will be probably rejected by packagers.
>  
>
FYI this is supposedly fixed in 5.1.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


>
>I think the problem could be solved if we were to include PHP in the
>main CVS, but not distribute it in the same tarball.  So the code is
>kept where it really belongs, and we allow building both things
>separately for the packagers' sake.
>
>  
>


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2005-04-04 22:47:42
Subject: Re: Notes on lock table spilling
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2005-04-04 21:19:46
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: YLDate: 2005-04-04 22:49:49
Subject: cygwin and psql
Previous:From: David LinkDate: 2005-04-04 21:26:25
Subject: Re: diskspace usage recovered on db rebuild

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group