Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 04:48:50PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
>The problem is that even if you could build a Postgres support package
>for PHP without building the whole PHP (which you _can_ do AFAIK), it
>means that you need to make a second pass at the PHP source RPM, which
>will be probably rejected by packagers.
FYI this is supposedly fixed in 5.1.
Joshua D. Drake
>I think the problem could be solved if we were to include PHP in the
>main CVS, but not distribute it in the same tarball. So the code is
>kept where it really belongs, and we allow building both things
>separately for the packagers' sake.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2005-04-04 22:47:42|
|Subject: Re: Notes on lock table spilling|
|Previous:||From: Robert Treat||Date: 2005-04-04 21:19:46|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?|
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: YL||Date: 2005-04-04 22:49:49|
|Subject: cygwin and psql|
|Previous:||From: David Link||Date: 2005-04-04 21:26:25|
|Subject: Re: diskspace usage recovered on db rebuild|