Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Marco Colombo <pgsql(at)esiway(dot)net>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>,pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-04 15:03:50
Message-ID: 42515756.3030604@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
>>
>> Sorry, but I don't buy it.
>
>
> I do. Actually I think no database is complete because no one includes
> LISP as a procedural language (pun on "procedural" intented).
> (BTW, I have no idea if a pl/LISP module ever existed.)

O.k. this is just a little sick ;0... Module-2 here I come.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



>
> .TM.



-- 
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL


Attachment: jd.vcf
Description: text/x-vcard (285 bytes)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2005-04-04 15:20:25
Subject: Unicode problems on IRC
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-04-04 15:02:30
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-04-04 15:14:02
Subject: Re: field definitions in view results?
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-04-04 15:02:30
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group