Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,"Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-04 15:02:30
Message-ID: 42515706.9030008@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
>Honestly, I think if we're going to spend time worrying about languages
>as features then we should be doing more to advertise the fact that
>perl/PHP/python/ruby/etc programmers can program in the database in
>their native language.
>
I agree with you completely.

> This is something that makes PostgreSQL unique
>and should provide additional incentive for people to use PostgreSQL. I
>don't think it matters much at all if those 'bonus languages' are
>included in core or not, at least not to end-users.
>  
>


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL


Attachment: jd.vcf
Description: text/x-vcard (285 bytes)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-04-04 15:03:50
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-04-04 14:50:25
Subject: Re: Vacuum time degrading

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-04-04 15:03:50
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Previous:From: Janning VygenDate: 2005-04-04 14:58:02
Subject: invalid input syntax for type bytea

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group