Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Leonardo F <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Date: 2010-01-22 18:09:28
Message-ID: 4251.1264183768@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Leonardo F <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it> writes:
> Would it make sense to use
> FormIndexDatum
> to get the index value to be used by tuplesort?

That would probably work. You might want to look at the code associated
with the recently-added exclusion constraint feature; that also has a
need to reproduce index entries sometimes.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2010-01-22 19:14:12 Review: listagg aggregate
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-01-22 18:04:43 Re: attoptions