Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Filip Hrbek <filip(dot)hrbek(at)plz(dot)comstar(dot)cz>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-03 02:55:18
Message-ID: 424F5B16.4030105@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

>>>d) Bringing PL/Java into core will force a consistent documentation
>>>and, I imagine, a chapter of it's own in the main docs. I'm happy
>>>to write most of it but English is not my native language. Whatever
>>>I put into print will always benefit from a review.
>>
>>There is nothing stop'ng a chapter being added now,
>
>
> Actually there is: We don't ship documentation for software that we
> don't ship.

How about we start a new standard extensions manual on pgFoundry, and
give the documentors from all the main extension projects commits on it.
That way it's all in one place :)

Or at least a PL's manual...

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-04-03 03:44:38 Re: How to copy from Table to table
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-04-03 02:49:20 Re: Debugging deadlocks

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2005-04-03 08:38:32 Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-04-02 23:46:37 Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?