Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Peter Eisentraut wrote: >Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > >>We at Command Prompt are in the process of completing >>a new rev of plPHP. The new rev will not require the >>PHP source. It will only require that PHP is installed. >> >> > >How can that be? > > I am not sure I understand the question but we are linking against the .so now. So as long as PHP is and PostgreSQL ./configure knows where to look we should be good. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > >>Are we interested in having plPHP in core? >> >> > >Personally, I'm not too excited about it. > > > -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
Attachment: jd.vcf
Description: text/x-vcard (285 bytes)
Description: text/x-vcard (285 bytes)
In response to
- Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? at 2005-04-02 05:38:19 from Peter Eisentraut
Responses
- Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? at 2005-04-02 15:49:52 from Peter Eisentraut
pgsql-hackers by date
Next: From: Dave Cramer Date: 2005-04-02 15:21:00 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Previous: From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig Date: 2005-04-02 15:12:36 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
pgsql-general by date
Next: From: Dave Cramer Date: 2005-04-02 15:21:00 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Previous: From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig Date: 2005-04-02 15:12:36 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?