Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-02 05:19:32
Message-ID: 424E2B64.4040709@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
>
>I'm thinking that a pl/PHP is much more interesting for the long term
>than, say, pl/tcl (mind you, I am a Tcl partisan from way back, but
>I see that many people are not so enlightened).  Barring any licensing
>problems I think this is something to pursue.
>  
>
Per the license issue it is licensed under the PHP and PostgreSQL
licenses.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



>			regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
>      joining column's datatypes do not match
>  
>


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL


Attachment: jd.vcf
Description: text/x-vcard (285 bytes)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-04-02 05:38:19
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-04-02 05:17:49
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-04-02 05:38:19
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-04-02 05:17:49
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group