Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Delete query takes exorbitant amount of time

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Karim Nassar <karim(dot)nassar(at)NAU(dot)EDU>,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Delete query takes exorbitant amount of time
Date: 2005-03-26 06:31:58
Message-ID: 424501DE.5010603@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
> There is clear benefit from forcing them to be the same. In logical data
> terms, they *should* be the same. I don't check fruit.apple_grade
> against fruit_type.orange_grade. When would I want to make a check of
> that nature? If there is a reason, thats great, lets keep status quo
> then.
> 
> I respect the effort and thought that has already gone into the
> implementation; I seek only to offer a very minor improvement based upon
> recent list issues.

The main problem would be people getting errors when upgrading their 
databases, or restoring from a backup, say.

Chris

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Bjoern MetzdorfDate: 2005-03-26 09:59:15
Subject: Re: How to improve db performance with $7K?
Previous:From: Alexander KirpaDate: 2005-03-26 03:21:25
Subject: Re: How to improve db performance with $7K?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group