Re: Erratic error message "ERROR: column "id_compte" does

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: David Pradier <dpradier(at)apartia(dot)fr>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Erratic error message "ERROR: column "id_compte" does
Date: 2005-03-16 14:52:55
Message-ID: 42384847.5010001@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Pradier wrote:
> Ok, understood.
> One can access the columns of the main query from the subquery,
> therefore in my own query the column "id_compte" is found,
> therefore there is no error message.
>
> Doesn't this count as a bug ?

Tricky, you could have something like:
SELECT a.* FROM a WHERE (a1,a2) IN (SELECT a1,b3 FROM b ...)

If that's legal, then so is your query.

> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:24:48PM +0000, Richard Huxton wrote:
>
>>David Pradier wrote:
>>
>>>Actually, the column "id_compte" is the primary key of the table "compte".
>>>The column "id_compte" doesn't exist in the table "operation".
>>>
>>>But i still don't understand why there is no error message, could you
>>>explain a little more ?
>>
>>I think it's intended for use in the WHERE clause:
>> SELECT a.* FROM a WHERE a1 IN (SELECT b3 FROM b WHERE b2=a2)

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-03-16 15:07:28 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2005-03-16 14:52:52 Re: PQexecParams