Tom Lane wrote:
>Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> writes:
>>I'm not sure what you mean. Earlier you rejected my bug-report on the
>>iterator because you it was the callers responsability to deal with it
>>(hence this patch). Are you now suggesting that we fix that bug instead?
>Quite honestly, I dunno. I agree that there's something lacking in this
>stack of behaviors, but I don't think any of the solutions suggested so
>far actually fix it ...
Ok, in that case, please allow this patch to go through. It will not
cause any harm and until a better solution is architected, it does solve
my immediate problem.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Nicolai Tufar||Date: 2005-03-16 11:36:50|
|Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail|
|Previous:||From: Mark Kirkwood||Date: 2005-03-16 08:47:31|
|Subject: Re: contrib/pg_buffercache|