Re: Patch that deals with that AtCommit_Portals encounters

From: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch that deals with that AtCommit_Portals encounters
Date: 2005-03-16 08:57:33
Message-ID: 4237F4FD.8040104@mailblocks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:

>Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>I'm not sure what you mean. Earlier you rejected my bug-report on the
>>iterator because you it was the callers responsability to deal with it
>>(hence this patch). Are you now suggesting that we fix that bug instead?
>>
>>
>
>Quite honestly, I dunno. I agree that there's something lacking in this
>stack of behaviors, but I don't think any of the solutions suggested so
>far actually fix it ...
>
>
Ok, in that case, please allow this patch to go through. It will not
cause any harm and until a better solution is architected, it does solve
my immediate problem.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicolai Tufar 2005-03-16 11:36:50 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2005-03-16 08:47:31 Re: contrib/pg_buffercache