Re: Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: "Thomas F(dot)O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Eric Crampton <escpg(at)eonomine(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Matthias Schmidt <schmidtm(at)mock-software(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch
Date: 2005-03-04 00:08:13
Message-ID: 4227A6ED.2020500@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> I have a feeling Bruce was referring to item 1.4:
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/readtext.php?src/FAQ/
> FAQ_DEV.html+Developers-FAQ#1.4

It has never been standard practice to ask for comments before the
development of small features, such as this one. The recently duplicated
work on allowing multiple "-t" and "-n" options in pg_dump is another
example (although that is complex enough an RFC might be worth doing).

Anyway, I think this is missing the point. Checking "has this work
already been done and is sitting in some patch queue somewhere?" before
doing anything presupposes the existence of a sizeable queue of
unapplied patches that is hard to find. I don't think either of those
should be true. I think Matthias' comment is well-founded: the
committers, myself included, deserve some blame for not making more
rapid progress on the queue of unapplied patches for 8.1. In the
meanwhile, the queue should be easier for folks to find (why is the
"pgpatches" queue the only one linked from postgresql.org, but it is
almost empty?)

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Qu Tianlian 2005-03-04 01:18:01 答复: Novice Slony User (Was [HACKERS] hi all)
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-03-03 23:43:14 Re: logging as inserts

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-03-04 00:11:12 Re: Faster install-sh in C
Previous Message Berényi Gábor 2005-03-04 00:00:29 Re: [INTERFACES] bcc32.mak for libpq broken? (distro 8.0.0) (fwd)