Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans
Date: 2005-02-25 16:09:35
Message-ID: 421F4DBF.7080007@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
> I would agree that since we have a number of commercial developers who
> do have intentions of working on specific items in 8.1, it would be nice
> to list those items somewhere (the urgent section of the TODO seems
> fine), but it is up to those developers to speak up.

I'd like to bundle pg_dump and pg_dumpall into a single binary, allowing 
pg_dumpall in custom (binary) format.  Dunno if I'll get the time though :)

I'd also like to backport 8.0's pg_dump to 7.4.x since I think it has 
'bug fixes'...

Chris

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Matthew T. O'ConnorDate: 2005-02-25 16:20:34
Subject: Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2005-02-25 16:06:05
Subject: Re: Development Plans

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Matthew T. O'ConnorDate: 2005-02-25 16:24:50
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2005-02-25 16:06:05
Subject: Re: Development Plans

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group