Kris Jurka wrote:
> Right, without knowing what method is actually being called and failing it
> is tough to determine if a workaround is available or how much work it
> would be to implement the method.
I read in the code that the Uninmplemented exception was designed to
reduce driver size, but would you consider a patch adding the name of
the unimplemented function to the message ?
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Kris Jurka||Date: 2005-02-10 09:08:54|
|Subject: Re: Crystal Reports / PostgreSQL|
|Previous:||From: Kris Jurka||Date: 2005-02-10 08:12:00|
|Subject: Re: SQLException: Invalid precision value. Cannot be less|