Re: pg_dump bug in 7.3.9 with sequences

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump bug in 7.3.9 with sequences
Date: 2005-02-08 09:38:40
Message-ID: 420888A0.4010807@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Not that I can see. You still have to get the sequence object from
> someplace, and having it be a distinct datatype is zero help for finding
> a column-specific sequence.

What about allowing sequence qualifiers in the SERIAL definition?

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-02-08 09:46:04 AT TIME ZONE
Previous Message Premsun Choltanwanich 2005-02-08 07:55:01 Re: How can I use large object on PostgreSQL Linux