On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> "Morris Goldstein" <morris(dot)x(dot)goldstein(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Suppose I have a database with $PGDATA on /dev/sda, and a tablespace
> > directory on /dev/sdb. Will Postgres start successfully if /dev/sda is
> > mounted and /dev/sdb is not? If not, why not?
>
> It will start, but you will have unpleasant failures when you try to use
> tables in the secondary tablespace

Understood. I can guarantee that there will be no such accesses until
/dev/sdb is mounted.

> ... note that if autovacuum is on,
> that is likely to happen even without any explicit action on your part.

That's a good point. We don't use autovacuum, and I guess we'd have to
forego it. (Or can it be turned on and off dynamically?)

But that makes me wonder: what about this sequence of events:

- Postgres running normally on /dev/sda and /dev/sdb.
- Update to table in /dev/sdb tablespace is committed but still exists in WAL.
- Postgres crashes (e.g. power failure).
- Postgres starts with /dev/sda only.
- Recovery needs to update table in /dev/sdb tablespace.

I assume bad things will happen in this case.

Jack

In response to

• Re: Can Postgres 8.x start if some disks containing tablespaces are not mounted? at 2008-03-31 18:10:35 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: Can Postgres 8.x start if some disks containing tablespaces are not mounted? at 2008-04-02 01:16:26 from Gurjeet Singh
• Re: Can Postgres 8.x start if some disks containing tablespaces are not mounted? at 2008-04-02 12:44:08 from Zdenek Kotala

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Michael Paesold	Date: 2008-04-01 14:21:34
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2008-04-01 14:06:01
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work

pgsql-general by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2008-04-01 14:22:03
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong
Previous:	From: korry	Date: 2008-04-01 14:11:30
	Subject: Re: Role attribute for user email?