From: | Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1 |
Date: | 2005-01-23 09:08:43 |
Message-ID: | 41F3699B.2060608@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki,
What is still missing to complete the 2PC patch?.
Regards,
Hans
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>>
>>> If the patch is ready to be committed early in the cycle, I'd say most
>>> definitely ... just depends on how late in the cycle its ready ...
>>
>>
>> My recollection is that it's quite far from being complete. I had hoped
>> to spend some time during the 8.1 cycle helping Heikki finish it up,
>> but if we stick to the 2-month-dev-cycle idea I'm afraid there's no way
>> it'll be done in time. I thought that "some time" would probably amount
>> to a solid man-month or so, and there's no way I can spend half my time
>> on just one feature for this cycle.
>>
>> If Heikki wants this in for 8.1, the right thing to do is vote against
>> the short-dev-cycle idea. But we need a plausible answer about what to
>> do about ARC to make that credible...
>
>
> I'm not sure what I want.
>
> If the 8.1 cycle really is a short one, say 3 months, then I have no
> problem waiting for 8.2. But we have a very bad track record regarding
> short-dev-cycles. I honestly don't believe we can get 8.1 released
> before July.
>
> - Heikki
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
--
Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig
Schoengrabern 134, A-2020 Hollabrunn, Austria
Tel: +43/660/816 40 77
www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-01-23 10:23:22 | Re: 8.1 development cycle (was a couple of other threads |
Previous Message | Ron Mayer | 2005-01-23 08:36:10 | Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*) |