| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hervé Piedvache <herve(at)elma(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |
| Date: | 2005-01-20 15:12:42 |
| Message-ID: | 41EFCA6A.1080802@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>> then I was thinking. Couldn't he use
>>multiple databases
>>over multiple servers with dblink?
>>
>>It is not exactly how I would want to do it, but it would provide what
>>he needs I think???
>>
>>
>
>Yes seems to be the only solution ... but I'm a little disapointed about
>this ... could you explain me why there is not this kind of
>functionnality ... it seems to be a real need for big applications no ?
>
>
Because it is really, really hard to do correctly and hard
equals expensive.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>Thanks all for your answers ...
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| jd.vcf | text/x-vcard | 285 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Wampler | 2005-01-20 15:14:28 | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-01-20 15:08:47 | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |