Bruce Momjian wrote:
>At this point, Andrew, Magnus, and I who deal with Win32 regularly all
>feel *.conf is more logical than *.txt. I have not heard anyone say
>*.txt is better except Tom. Is that enough of a vote?
*ahem* :-) I though what I said was that we should leave the name alone
except for removing a leading dot. I have seen other cases where .foorc
became foo.rc on windows, which isn't a bad solution for such files.
I honestly don't care that much - it's not worth a religious fight over.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-01-10 19:37:44|
|Subject: Re: PG 8.0: the launch clock is running |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-01-10 16:39:53|
|Subject: Re: "SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted" failure identified |
pgsql-hackers-win32 by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2005-01-10 21:46:46|
|Subject: More Code Page wierdness|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-01-10 16:20:17|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions.. |