Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>,pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org,"Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>,"T(dot)J(dot)" <tjtoocool(at)phreaker(dot)net>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Date: 2005-01-10 17:17:12
Message-ID: 41E2B898.2060802@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>
>At this point, Andrew, Magnus, and I who deal with Win32 regularly all
>feel *.conf is more logical than *.txt.  I have not heard anyone say
>*.txt is better except Tom. Is that enough of a vote?
>
>  
>

*ahem* :-) I though what I said was that we should leave the name alone 
except for removing a leading dot. I have seen other cases where .foorc 
became foo.rc on windows, which isn't a bad solution for such files.

I honestly don't care that much - it's not worth a religious fight over.

cheers

andrew



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-01-10 19:37:44
Subject: Re: PG 8.0: the launch clock is running
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-01-10 16:39:53
Subject: Re: "SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted" failure identified

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2005-01-10 21:46:46
Subject: More Code Page wierdness
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-01-10 16:20:17
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group