| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "T(dot)J(dot)" <tjtoocool(at)phreaker(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions.. |
| Date: | 2005-01-08 22:02:04 |
| Message-ID: | 41E0585C.3070207@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Tom Lane wrote:
>"T.J." <tjtoocool(at)phreaker(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>Has anyone else tested out the use of client certs with the new win
>>code? Rebuilt the latest from scratch and I started getting SSL SYSCALL,
>>so I went into fe-secure.c, and commented out line 842 (again), and now
>>it works (again). Any ideas why commenting that line is such a
>>penicillin? Or rather, why that if statement is causing such problems.
>>
>>
>
>Doh --- isn't fstat's st_ino a meaningless value on Windows?
>
>
Pretty much, yes. See
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vclib/html/_crt__fstat.2c_._fstati64.asp
and
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vclib/html/_crt__stat.2c_._wstat.2c_._stati64.2c_._wstati64.asp
The latter states: "The inode, and therefore *st_ino*, has no meaning
in the FAT, HPFS, or NTFS file systems." The fstat page doesn't even
refer to it at all.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-08 22:26:39 | Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions.. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-08 17:37:49 | Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions.. |