Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..

From: "T(dot)J(dot)" <tjtoocool(at)phreaker(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org,"Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Date: 2005-01-07 15:51:32
Message-ID: 41DEB004.5090102@phreaker.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
For some reason this morning it's working fine and not even falling into 
the "changed during execution" error. Maybe it was just windows being 
its charming self, since I didn't modify anything since last night. 
Either way, I'd say it's working.

T.J. wrote:

> Okay, I've been up all night testing this out and here's what I've got...
>
> I sprinkled some printf's in fe-secure.c because a different error 
> starting coming up...
>
> I discovered that on an initial connection open_client_SSL was 
> attempted 4 times. r is -1 three times, then 0 the fourth time. The 
> first three times err is 2, the last time err is 1.
>
> SSL Initialization isn't entered until the third try. But it works 
> fine, the homedir, usercertfile and userkeyfile are identified 
> correctly (c:\Documents and Settings\User\ApplicationData/postgresql, 
> postgresql.crt, postgresql.key, respectively)
>
> The error coming up states that the private key file was changed 
> during execution. I looked at it (the error checker) and it has 
> something to do with comparing two buffers...
>
> Anyways, after figuring out what was going on I went into that error 
> function and commented out the return 0, recompiled and a successful 
> SSL connection was made :)
>
> Good work guys, you rock. =)
>
>> I'm out of here myself too, it's getting pretty late. Patches too late
>> in the evening tend to need reversal in the morning...:-)
>>
>> But it seems to be working so far - at least as good as it did with RC3.
>> If someone can test the client certificate stuff (that didn't work
>> before), that'd be great.
>>
>> //Magnus
>>
>>  
>>
>
>



In response to

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-01-07 16:03:50
Subject: Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2005-01-07 15:43:01
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8 win32 native confilct with Cygwin?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group