| From: | Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su> |
|---|---|
| To: | Steve Simms <steve(at)deefs(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bugs in comment moderation scripts |
| Date: | 2004-12-24 16:36:35 |
| Message-ID: | 41CC4593.6040001@cs.msu.su |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Hi,
Steve Simms wrote:
> Looking at what's in CVS, it looks like there's a step missing. When you
> reject a comment, it puts together an E-Mail to the person who submitted it
> saying "Your comment was rejected from PostgreSQL manual" with the body
> "Insert a semi-friendly explanation here \n The original comment follows".
No, there's no step missing, I expected someone to put a "canned" answer
in this place.
I don't think it's worth the effort to write an explanation for every
spam piece added via our comment interface. The better approach would be
to add a prominent warning to comment form and send a "you violated our
comment guidelines"-type email on comment rejection.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Simms | 2004-12-24 16:42:08 | Re: Bugs in comment moderation scripts |
| Previous Message | Steve Simms | 2004-12-24 15:33:32 | Re: Bugs in comment moderation scripts |