From: | Rodrigo Carvalhaes <grupos(at)carvalhaes(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pg_restore taking 4 hours! |
Date: | 2004-12-01 11:16:58 |
Message-ID: | 41ADA82A.7070405@carvalhaes.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
Hi!
I am using PostgreSQL with a proprietary ERP software in Brazil. The
database have around 1.600 tables (each one with +/- 50 columns).
My problem now is the time that takes to restore a dump. My customer
database have arount 500mb (on the disk, not the dump file) and I am
making the dump with pg_dump -Fc, my dumped file have 30mb. To make the
dump, it's taking +/- 1,5 hours BUT to restore (using pg_restore ) it it
takes 4 - 5 hours!!!
Our machine it's a Dell Server Power Edge 1600sc (Xeon 2,4Ghz, with 1GB
memory, 7200 RPM disk). I don't think that there is a machine problem
because it's a server dedicated for the database and the cpu utilization
during the restore is around 30%.
Looking on the lists arquives I found some messages about this and Tom
Lane was saying that then you have a lot of convertions the dump can
delay too much. 90% of the columns on my database are char columns and I
don't have large objects on the database. The restore is delaying too
much because the conversion of the char columns ? How can I have a
better performance on this restore?
I need to find a solution for this because I am convincing customers
that are using SQL Server, DB2 and Oracle to change to PostgreSQL but
this customers have databases of 5GB!!! I am thinking that even with a
better server, the restore will take 2 days!
My data:
Conectiva Linux 10 , Kernel 2.6.8
PostgreSQL 7.4.6.
postgresql.conf modified parameters (the other parameters are the default)
tcpip_socket = true
max_connections = 30
shared_buffers = 30000
sort_mem = 4096
vacuum_mem = 8192
max_fsm_pages = 20000
max_fsm_relations = 1000
Regards,
Rodrigo Carvalhaes
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Geoffrey | 2004-12-01 11:48:54 | Re: Upcoming Changes to News Server ... |
Previous Message | Chris Green | 2004-12-01 09:33:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Adding Reply-To: <listname> to Lists configuration ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | George Woodring | 2004-12-01 13:29:55 | Re: Query Performance and IOWait |
Previous Message | gnari | 2004-12-01 08:24:59 | Re: FW: Index usage |