On 11/27/2004 7:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Thomas F.O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> writes:
>> So why not have VACUUM FULL FREEZE just do what you propose: VACUUM
>> FULL then VACUUM FREEZE.
> The objective is to make it more safe, not less so. Doing that would
> require rewriting a whole bunch of code, which I am not up for at this
> stage of the release cycle.
If the proper fix is too invasive for 8.0, then making FULL and FREEZE
mutually exclusive is IMHO the right thing to do for 8.0.
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jan Wieck||Date: 2004-11-30 17:04:25|
|Subject: Re: Opinions on Usenet ...|
|Previous:||From: Mark Wong||Date: 2004-11-30 16:55:01|
|Subject: Re: 8.0beta5 results w/ dbt2|