Re: ODBC driver for Windows & future...

From: Johan Wehtje <joweht(at)tpgi(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Simeó Reig <simeo(at)incofisa(dot)com>, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ODBC driver for Windows & future...
Date: 2004-11-30 12:07:27
Message-ID: 41AC627F.6070708@tpgi.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

I also think that a high performance ODBC driver will be critical to the
success of Postgresql 8.0, given that the advent of Native windows
support offers such a huge opportunity for Postgresql to show it's
mettle as a MS SQL Server killer. In particular what is the status of
the ODBC driver in relation to the many changes that have occurred
between 7.x and 8. ?

On Windows platforms ODBC will remain the default method to quickly link
a Database with any number of applications for some time to come.

Simeó Reig wrote:

>>Hi,
>>
>>I think I'm not the only one to get worried about the future of the
>>PGSQL ODBC driver. Since Iroshi has left last year, I have seen fixes
>>now and then, but nobody seems to understand anymore how the driver
>>really works...
>>
>>What most surprises me, is that there is not viable commercial
>>alternative to the open-source ODBC driver. All the commercial drivers I
>>have tested do not work at all... On the opposite, the PGSQL .NET driver
>>development seems to be quite active, so does that mean ODBC is dead?
>>I'm sure we are really a lot out here to be interested in a clean ODBC
>>driver for Windows. If it continues like this, Postgresql will end up
>>being a fantastic database, but cut out from the rest of the world.
>>Well, the ODBC world at least.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>So, what next?
>>
>>
>
>
>we have been using the driver since three years ago, we had made an
>application
>with 40 concurrent ODBC users, 144 tables and milions of rows, postgresql is
>fantastic, with a great performance (dell 2650 dual processor raid 10) and
>the most important : zero problems in three years.
>
>Now, we have to make other application but we will not use postgresql
>because
>we don't trust ODBC project, seems nobody understands nothing !! People make
>questions and nobody answer, people offer his help and nobody answer, where
>are
>the mantainers of the project ?? I remember three years ago when Iroshi
>leader the
>project this things never had happened.
>
>why iroshi leaves the project ?? what was the unpleased reason ?
>
>
>
>
>>1. Does the driver have to be completely rewritten? I have heard of a
>>new 7.4 protocol that the actual driver does not support, and of libpq,
>>that could be used to access the database, but really, that's all I
>>know... Can these changes be incorporated in the actual driver?
>>
>>
>
>speed,full ODBC 3.0 compliant, SSL, data compression,
>full large object support ...and the most important : new people
>with new ideas.
>
>
>
>>2. Can anyone draw a skeleton of the how the "ideal" driver should be
>>architectured? I remember seeing quite a lot of volunteers a few months
>>ago, and I'm willing to do so myself, but "developing an ODBC driver" is
>>not something we do every morning before coffee...
>>
>>
>
>yes, it's a hard work
>
>
>
>>Anyway, thanks to all of you that bring something to open-source.
>>Postgresql through ODBC is still a viable production technology, I
>>notice it every day. I'm just worring about the future...
>>
>>
>
>Postgresql is one of the most greats databases but if you want to work
>with an application that uses windows ODBC (visual basic, Fox Pro, asp,
>asp.net ...) is turning on a "russian roulette".
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
>.
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2004-11-30 12:45:06 Re: ODBC driver for Windows & future...
Previous Message Simeó Reig 2004-11-30 10:16:14 Re: ODBC driver for Windows & future...