Re: Going for Gold

Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>[mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of
>>Andreas Pflug
>>Sent: 29 November 2004 10:24
>>To: pgadmin-hackers
>>Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Going for Gold
>>
>>Hi friends,
>>
>>seems pgAdmin III 1.2RC is matured, should we make it Gold
>>now? Tom Lane promised to avoid further changes to the pgsql
>>system schema, so hopefully we won't face similar problems as
>>with beta4->beta5 again.
>>
>>As soon as pgsql8.0 is out, we can roll 1.2.1 to update the
>>documentation to the release version, but we shouldn't delay
>>1.2.0 for it.
>
>
> Sounds good to me. Are the docs/screenshots/pg docs etc up to date?

Look ok for me.
>
> I can probably roll it tomorrow.... (following which I'll branch for
> -patches)

Lets go! 1.3 is waiting.

Regards,
Andreas