Re: Postgres vs. MySQL

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Evilio del Rio <edelrio(at)cmima(dot)csic(dot)es>
Cc: dspam-users(at)networkdweebs(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres vs. MySQL
Date: 2004-11-24 15:57:00
Message-ID: 41A4AF4C.60404@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Evilio del Rio wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I have installed the dspam filter
>(http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam) on our mail server
>(RedHat 7.3 Linux with sendmail 8.13 and procmail). I have ~300 users
>with a quite low traffic of 4000 messages/day. So it's a quite common
>platform/environment, nothing spectacular.
>
>
>
The problem is definately dspam. We have been through their code.
The new version is much, much better than the older one but I am sure
there is more work to be done.

The first version we installed suffered from a well known problem:

It would use smallint/bigint but would not cast or quote the
where clauses and thus PostgreSQL would never use the indexes.

It was also missing several indexes on appropriate columns.

We offered some advice and we know that some of it was taken but
we don't know which.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment Content-Type Size
jd.vcf text/x-vcard 285 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2004-11-24 16:06:23 Re: memcached and PostgreSQL
Previous Message Alexandre Leclerc 2004-11-24 15:39:03 Re: Data type to use for primary key