Tom Lane wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>I take this as confirmation that calling pg_usleep is the Right Thing (tm).
>>Here's the patch.
Darnit, I caught one and not the other. Here's a oneline fix.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-11-18 17:09:48|
|Subject: Re: plpgsql on 8.0b4 bug? |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-11-18 16:43:12|
|Subject: Timing of pgstats updates|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-11-18 17:13:57|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_arch.c call to sleep() |
|Previous:||From: Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD||Date: 2004-11-18 13:06:30|
|Subject: Re: pg_resetxlog options|