Re: PostgreSQL in the press again

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
Date: 2004-11-14 05:38:09
Message-ID: 4196EF41.2080706@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Jan Wieck wrote:

> On 11/13/2004 12:06 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>>>
>>> It is never the fault of a programming language per se. People with
>>> a good understanding of object design will write "object oriented
>>> code" in every language, even assembler. People who just don't know
>>> what they are doing will write bad code, and the best Pascal
>>> compiler in the world won't be able to prevent that.
>>
>>
>> Yes but I believe even you would agree that their are programming
>> languages that are better for certain tasks than others. The use of
>> java as a replication engine for PostgreSQL seems, well... incorrect.
>
>
> Mammoth is written in C, the followup for eRServer will be C (++?) and
> Slony is C ... I guess disagreeing would be, well ... ignorant.

Heh :)

>
>
> Jan
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment Content-Type Size
jd.vcf text/x-vcard 285 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2004-11-14 07:05:21 Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2004-11-13 23:19:33 Re: PostgreSQL in the press again