Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ReadBuffer() error checking

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ReadBuffer() error checking
Date: 2004-11-14 02:06:31
Message-ID: 4196BDA7.8070508@samurai.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Agreed.  I get the impression that at one time it was not so, but
> certainly for the last many years there's been no need to test.

Patch applied.

> A related issue in the same general area is that the smgr code is
> currently implemented to elog on error, but its API still reflects
> an assumption that it will return a failure indication.  Changing
> the API is a larger change than I want to see during late beta,
> but it's a cleanup that would be reasonable to undertake during
> a future development cycle, if you're interested.

Sure, I'll take a look at it once we branch for 8.0.

-Neil

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-11-14 02:25:02
Subject: Re: CVS should die
Previous:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2004-11-14 00:20:03
Subject: Re: CVS should die

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group