Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL in the press again

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>,pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
Date: 2004-11-13 23:19:33
Message-ID: 41969685.5010305@Yahoo.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On 11/13/2004 12:06 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>>
>> It is never the fault of a programming language per se. People with a 
>> good understanding of object design will write "object oriented code" 
>> in every language, even assembler. People who just don't know what 
>> they are doing will write bad code, and the best Pascal compiler in 
>> the world won't be able to prevent that.
> 
> Yes but I believe even you would agree that their are programming 
> languages that are better for certain tasks than others. The use of java 
> as a replication engine for PostgreSQL seems, well... incorrect.

Mammoth is written in C, the followup for eRServer will be C (++?) and 
Slony is C ... I guess disagreeing would be, well ... ignorant.


Jan

-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2004-11-14 05:38:09
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-11-13 20:21:12
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group