Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL in the press again

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>,pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
Date: 2004-11-13 17:06:44
Message-ID: 41963F24.1060606@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
>
> It is never the fault of a programming language per se. People with a 
> good understanding of object design will write "object oriented code" 
> in every language, even assembler. People who just don't know what 
> they are doing will write bad code, and the best Pascal compiler in 
> the world won't be able to prevent that.

Yes but I believe even you would agree that their are programming 
languages that are better for certain tasks than others. The use of java 
as a replication engine for PostgreSQL seems, well... incorrect.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



>
>
> Jan
>


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL


Attachment: jd.vcf
Description: text/x-vcard (285 bytes)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-11-13 17:45:50
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 2004-11-13 15:11:12
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group