Magnus Hagander wrote:
>If this is accepted I also plan to do a patch to split out the forkexec
>code into a separate file and try to clean up the dependencies a bit
>further. It'd be nice if I could get that into 8.0.0 (which would
>probably mean this beta, since it seems to be the last one), but it's
>I'd also like to take a look at moving the parameter file into shared
>memory at least on win32, since it gives thefilesystem quite a bit of
>trashing. I think that can be done pretty easily, but I'm not sure if
>there'll be tinme for that in 8.0.0 either.
Both excellent things to do. The use of the file system for this is ...
ugly, although it was quite a sensible thing to do while we got other
parts of the mechanism right.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-11-13 23:37:08|
|Subject: Re: ReadBuffer() error checking |
|Previous:||From: Robert Treat||Date: 2004-11-13 14:08:07|
|Subject: Re: Give the TODO list a little more verbose explanation|