Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Win32 signals & sockets

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 signals & sockets
Date: 2004-11-13 14:31:34
Message-ID: 41961AC6.7050405@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Magnus Hagander wrote:

>
>If this is accepted I also plan to do a patch to split out the forkexec
>code into a separate file and try to clean up the dependencies a bit
>further. It'd be nice if I could get that into 8.0.0 (which would
>probably mean this beta, since it seems to be the last one), but it's
>not critical.
>I'd also like to take a look at moving the parameter file into shared
>memory at least on win32, since it gives thefilesystem quite a bit of
>trashing. I think that can be done pretty easily, but I'm not sure if
>there'll be tinme for that in 8.0.0 either.
>
>  
>

Both excellent things to do. The use of the file system for this is ... 
ugly, although it was quite a sensible thing to do while we got other 
parts of the mechanism right.

cheers

andrew

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-11-13 23:37:08
Subject: Re: ReadBuffer() error checking
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2004-11-13 14:08:07
Subject: Re: Give the TODO list a little more verbose explanation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group