Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
Cc: Joerg Hessdoerfer <Joerg(dot)Hessdoerfer(at)sea-gmbh(dot)com>,PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Date: 2004-11-05 12:36:32
Message-ID: 418B73D0.6000705@samurai.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Another compelling reason to use SVN is that one of their long term 
> goals is to use an SQL backend.

That is about as far from a "compelling reason" to use a particular 
version control system as I can imagine.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Gaetano MendolaDate: 2004-11-05 12:48:22
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2004-11-05 12:33:06
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-11-05 13:13:18
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Previous:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2004-11-05 12:28:25
Subject: Re: CVS should die

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group