Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas?

From: Michael Guerin <guerin(at)rentec(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas?
Date: 2004-10-29 19:57:18
Message-ID: 4182A09E.5000608@rentec.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-novice
Tom Lane wrote:

>Michael Guerin <guerin(at)rentec(dot)com> writes:
>  
>
>>Postgresql just reset itself, this is what I found in the log.
>>FATAL:  block 26 of 1663/17228/3425958479 is still referenced (local 2)
>>LOG:  server process (PID 1887) exited with exit code 1
>>LOG:  terminating any other active server processes
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>pg version: 8 beta3
>>    
>>
>
>You sure that's beta3?  Because we reduced that error condition from
>FATAL to ERROR between beta2 and beta3.  (And fixed the bug I think
>you hit, too.)
>
>			regards, tom lane
>  
>
fiasco=> select version();
                                         version
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 PostgreSQL 8.0.0beta3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 
3.3.1 (SuSE Linux)
(1 row)



In response to

Responses

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-29 20:01:03
Subject: Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-29 19:52:48
Subject: Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-29 20:01:03
Subject: Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-29 19:52:48
Subject: Re: Postgresql crash- any ideas?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group