Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

From: Mark Harrison <mh(at)pixar(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>, "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>,Omar Kilani <omar(at)tinysofa(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, emily(at)tinysofa(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Date: 2004-10-28 21:59:28
Message-ID: 41816BC0.9040902@pixar.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>>
>> Well, that's a call for the design pros.  But take a look at leading 
>> mass-market sites - Yahoo, AOL, eBay, NY Times, etc.  They're still 
>> hardcoded to 800.
> 
> 
> Yes, and remarkably hard to read due to the amount of data they try to 
> squeeze into that space :). I am not saying we should not support 
> 800x600, I am just saying that 1024x768 is probably a decent enough 
> constraint. If you are browsing the web in 800x600 you expect to have to 
> scroll a little (emphasis little).

I don't mind scrolling down, but I dislike having to scroll side to side.
I have a large monitor, but typically don't maximize my brower.

Just FWIW!
Mark

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: John HansenDate: 2004-10-28 22:18:29
Subject: Re: Is Search Down ?
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-10-28 21:23:44
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] perceived absence of work on website

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Gavin SherryDate: 2004-10-28 23:28:21
Subject: Re: perceived absence of work on website
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-10-28 21:23:44
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] perceived absence of work on website

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group