Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

From: Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>
To: Mitch Pirtle <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Date: 2004-10-28 13:54:18
Message-ID: 4180FA0A.4020203@cs.msu.su
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Hi,

Mitch Pirtle wrote:
> I just can't see that the website for a database is so
> special that it requires a ground-up approach of cobbled-together
> libraries and proprietary code.

The code is under BSD license and it uses several PEAR packages, not
"cobbled-together libraries". You know what PEAR is, eh?

> I would love to help out, but after a couple weeks of reading the
> threads I'm not sure how to help, or if it is really welcome. Who is
> in charge, what is the plan, and how can I (realistically) help?

You are currently not offering help. You are cheerleading for your
particular CMS. Reality check: will you still be ready to help if we
don't standartize on your particular Nuke clone? Are you actually aware
of the website requirements?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-10-28 14:16:13 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Previous Message Mitch Pirtle 2004-10-28 13:40:39 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-10-28 14:16:13 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Previous Message Dave Page 2004-10-28 13:46:27 Re: pgweb-commits working?