Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PL/pgSQL Loop Vs. Batch Update

From: David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL Loop Vs. Batch Update
Date: 2006-04-26 03:18:05
Message-ID: 4180CE7A-4FD4-466B-B4C0-CF6754DF7945@kineticode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Apr 25, 2006, at 19:36, Tom Lane wrote:

> It looks like you had something trivial as the definition of foo().

Yeah, the function call. :-)

> Try one of the actual queries from the plpgsql function.

Oh. Duh. Will do. Tomorrow.

Best,

David


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: markDate: 2006-04-26 06:48:53
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Previous:From: Ron PeacetreeDate: 2006-04-26 03:07:17
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group