Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

From: Emily Boyd <emily(at)tinysofa(dot)org>
To: Mitch Pirtle <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>, "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>,pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org,emily(at)tinysofa(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Date: 2004-10-27 18:22:02
Message-ID: 417FE74A.80308@tinysofa.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
Mitch Pirtle wrote:
> Tom,  that layout is a PNG graphic, of course it doesn't scale ;-)
> 
> But this design (done right, which I suspect Omar & Emily of doing)
> could easily collapse 200 pixels to drop to a minimum 800 pixels wide.
>  To me this is a non issue.

Before this turns into a debate on a technicality such as how much space 
Tom lets me have on his screen... :)

Just wanted to note that this is a fixed size design proposal, and it 
will scale gracefully to 800 x 600 upon HTMLification.

> And if you've got a big monitor, then use it!  Why pretend to surf on
> a Palm Pilot?
> 
> -- Mitch

(I was going to mention that it was a PNG... but Mitch beat me to it... :)

Regards,
Emily Boyd

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2004-10-27 18:23:25
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Previous:From: Mitch PirtleDate: 2004-10-27 18:15:26
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2004-10-27 18:23:25
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Previous:From: Mitch PirtleDate: 2004-10-27 18:15:26
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group