Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

From: Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>, Omar Kilani <omar(at)tinysofa(dot)org>,pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org,emily(at)tinysofa(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Date: 2004-10-27 17:54:10
Message-ID: 417FE0C2.2030407@nedscape.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Ned Lilly wrote:
> 
>> I like it too, very much.  Only question is, how does the design scale 
>> to 800x600, which should probably still be the minimum?
> 
> 
> I seriously doubt anyone trying to use PostgreSQL is stuck at 800x600.
> 1024x768 is probably good enough. It does fix in 1024x768 btw :)

Well, that's a call for the design pros.  But take a look at leading mass-market sites - Yahoo, AOL, eBay, NY Times, etc.  They're still hardcoded to 800.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2004-10-27 18:02:40
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-27 17:47:40
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2004-10-27 18:02:40
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-27 17:47:40
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group