Re: [HACKERS] Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general]

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general]
Date: 2004-10-18 00:22:08
Message-ID: 41730CB0.60903@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com wrote:

> If the resource owner is always responsible for releasing locked
> buffers, who releases the locks if the backend crashes?

The semaphore "undo" I hope.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-18 00:31:20 Re: Open Items
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-10-17 23:36:16 Re: DETERMINISTIC as synonym for IMMUTABLE

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message charavay 2004-10-18 08:50:21 Indexes performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-10-17 20:12:35 Re: Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...)